It’s always good to chat |
I want to unpack local
ownership and leadership which is critical to the success of development
intervention. Donors invest billions on development interventions, often
wondering whether national ownership and leadership will emerge; whether the
intervention will be sustainable… basically whether any resulting change will
last beyond the programme’s duration.
International development
programmes are like a fleeting moment in the lives of intended beneficiaries. During my career, I
have encountered two types of beneficiaries:
- Drivers: people who engage for the
right reasons, because they see development interventions as an opportunity to
really contribute to the development of their community or country. They
withstand enormous challenges and continue to demonstrate themselves as
citizens.
- Passengers: people who engage to the
extent to which they can extract benefits for themselves alone.
It is important to distinguish which kind of beneficiaries are
involved to avoid disappointment and waste valuable resources. Generally, you
will find that “drivers” are always in motion – advocating and trying their
hardest in challenging conditions and with meagre resources. “Passengers”
generally hop from one foreign aid wagon to the next.
But often development practitioners fail to
create the conditions for “drivers” to emerge because they approach development
with fixed views about how implementation should occur. They draw experiences from
other country contexts. I refer to such individuals as being from the
“When I” Club: “When I was in Afghanistan” or “When I was in Bangladesh”.
Practitioners are often guilty of this, myself included, but I always remember
that context matters more.
The point I really want to get to in this blog is that
practitioners should be prepared to listen more to
potential beneficiaries and trust the power of local content solutions. This
means setting aside pre-conceived ideas about what works and what does not and
reflect on how, where and on whom value is placed…. or not as the case may be.
For me, it is pretty basic, national ownership and leadership can only emerge if as development practitioners we allow nationals to own and lead from the outset, valuing their ideas, opinions and solutions to their development challenges. Donor and beneficiaries need to carefully think about the power dynamics within development interventions. Donors talk about beneficiary monitoring and feedback loops. But what does this really tell us once the power dynamics have been set? What donors often hear through such mechanisms is what beneficiaries think they want to hear, rather than how beneficiaries really feel.
Don’t start the conversation with: "How can I help?" But
rather: "How do you think your situation can be
improved?" "Ok, so where can I add value, if at all?"
"Let’s
chat…because I want to hear more about what you have to
say….."
Comments
Post a Comment